Explaining the same corrections to your AI again?
If you keep restating brand tone, storyboard, and forbidden elements, the same corrections repeat. Install Cairn for Claude Code, then bring the criteria a person approved into the next video.
npx -y @pairtrace/cairn --claude
Review and approve the criteria again for each new task.
Make a past correction your next starting point.
Illustrative example · brand video job
You asked your AI
“Write a 15-second storyboard in this brand tone.”
But the same things are missing
You explain the agreed cut order, the restrained tone, and the logo-distortion ban again, then revise.
Criteria to keep in Cairn
- Keep the agreed storyboard cut order.
- Hold the brand tone and do not add exaggeration.
- Do not add forbidden elements such as logo distortion or competitor mentions.
For the next video → select the criteria you need and bring them into a new task.
An illustrative workflow, not a real customer outcome.
An AI proposal does not change the scope of human approval.
Cairn does not control arbitrary AI behavior or guarantee real external execution. Every new task and reuse begins with a new proposal and human permission.
Install Cairn for Claude Code.
The install line adds Cairn to Claude Code. Cursor remains available with npx -y @pairtrace/cairn. Account and work records live at mcp.pairtrace.com.
npx -y @pairtrace/cairn --claude